In Alec Couros Chapter 6 of “Developing Personal Learning Networks for Open and Social Learning,” I was exposed to the idea of ‘Adult Learning Theory’ for the first time. Wow! After learning about it, I now am able to reflect and understand what Alec meant by how important it was to consider in the teaching and creating of EC&I 831. The main idea is that adults learn differently than children and this must be acknowledged and the differences which can be seen must be accommodated when teaching. Among the points which Alec shared, the one which resonated with me most was “Adults are most interested in learning subjects that have immediate relevance to their job or personal life.” As university students, we have chosen to take these courses due to the fact that we relate to them and at least in some way, feel as though they could be of benefit in our lives. Reflecting on my academic career, the classes and topics which I have been most interested in and passionate about are the ones that I deem as useful in my own life. I find myself continually engaged in EDCI 338 as I am able to relate to the content and I can see how it can fit into my personal life. I think if I was unable to relate to the content covered, I would be less interested in participating in discussion and would not be as involved with my learning pod if I thought it was not of relevance to me. I think this is an integral point to consider when creating a course, you must base it on relatable content and of use to the individuals whom you are teaching to.

As the concept of open teaching emerges, I wonder how we will see this impact courses in the future. Will we begin to see more syllabuses be left open to student discretion and influence? As of right now, syllabuses for the majority of courses I have taken are set in stone. They outline the entire course and there is no opportunity for student opinion to influence them, I wonder if this will continue to be the case or if students will have the opportunity to further voice their opinions.